Lesenswert: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus openaccess.nrw
Zur Navigation springen Zur Suche springen
Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung
Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung
Zeile 25: Zeile 25:
*Ross-Hellauer (2022). Open science, done wrong, will compound inequities. Nature 603, 363. [https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-00724-0 https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-00724-0]
*Ross-Hellauer (2022). Open science, done wrong, will compound inequities. Nature 603, 363. [https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-00724-0 https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-00724-0]
*UNESCO (2021). UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science. [https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379949.locale=en https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379949.locale=en]
*UNESCO (2021). UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science. [https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379949.locale=en https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379949.locale=en]
*DORA (2023). San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. [https://sfdora.org/read/]
*DORA (2013). San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. [https://sfdora.org/read/]





Version vom 20. Dezember 2023, 10:57 Uhr

OA for Beginners


Open Access in Deutschland


Open-Access-Transformation


Open-Science


Gute wissenschaftliche Praxis


Datentracking


DEAL


Urheberrecht


International