Lesenswert: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus openaccess.nrw
Zur Navigation springen Zur Suche springen
Zeile 25: Zeile 25:
 
*Ross-Hellauer (2022). Open science, done wrong, will compound inequities. Nature 603, 363. [https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-00724-0 https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-00724-0]
 
*Ross-Hellauer (2022). Open science, done wrong, will compound inequities. Nature 603, 363. [https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-00724-0 https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-00724-0]
 
*UNESCO (2021). UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science. [https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379949.locale=en https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379949.locale=en]
 
*UNESCO (2021). UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science. [https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379949.locale=en https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379949.locale=en]
*DORA (2023). The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. [https://sfdora.org/read/]
+
*DORA (2023). San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. [https://sfdora.org/read/]
 +
 
  
 
'''Gute wissenschaftliche Praxis'''
 
'''Gute wissenschaftliche Praxis'''

Version vom 20. Dezember 2023, 11:57 Uhr

OA for Beginners


Open Access in Deutschland


Open-Access-Transformation


Open-Science


Gute wissenschaftliche Praxis


Datentracking


DEAL


Urheberrecht


International